A new Google device surfaced at the FCC today that could well be the upcoming Pixel Tablet. At the FCC, the tablet appeared under Google's ID as A4RGTU8P. However, A4RGTU8P is not the model number of the upcoming Google Pixel tablet. This device is listed as "Wireless Device", which is a fairly generic description. Nowhere in these documents is it referred to as a tablet. The device supports Bluetooth LE, WiFi 6 and UWB. While that's not the most concrete proof that this is actually the Pixel Tablet, what else could it be? Sources): FCC The post Google's Pixel Tablet may have appeared at FCC appeared first on xiaomist's blog .
The Chinese manufacturer Huawei has dealt with the USA in numerous questions. The United States government claims that Huawei is a security risk. However, Huawei has vehemently rejected these claims. Still, the U.S. has banned Huawei, a decision that harms the company in some ways.
The United States not only banned Huawei, but they convince everyone who wants to work with Huawei to do the same. To this end, some U.S. loyalists such as Australia and others have already banished Huawei from their 5G network.
Washinton believes the Chinese Intelligence Act will force Huawei to spy for the Chinese government. In fact, the law actually sounds a little suspicious. Part of it reads: "Every organization or every citizen should support, support and cooperate with the national secret service in accordance with the law" .
However, such laws are not new to us. Many countries have laws designed to help the government fight crime or protect national security.
US laws also force companies to release data
Let's take a look at the US Electronic Communication Privacy Act 1986. Part of this law reads: "A provider of a wired or electronic communications service ... provides ... any information, facilities, or technical assistance that is required" to communicate between American or non-US citizens who are in the United States live to intercept.
Another American law called FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) is quite similar to the new Chinese law. According to Wikipedia, "the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is a federal law, the process for the physical and electronic surveillance and collection of" information by foreign intelligence " between " foreign powers " and " agents of foreign powers " used by espionage or the Terrorism are suspected.
Although this law requires special court permission, the number of applications is a surprise. In 2018, 1,080 applications for electronic monitoring were made and ALL but one were approved.
USA can even get data from foreign servers
What about the US CLOUD law? This law states that the government can force US technology companies to disclose data stored on servers outside the United States. So even if you are outside the United States and the server is also outside the United States, as long as it belongs to an American company, the government can access the data it contains.
In 2018, the Australian Parliament passed the Aid and Access Act. This law is also known as the "Anti-Encryption Law". Technically, this law can force Australian companies to disable encryption that keeps their data private. Companies like Apple, WhatsApp and Cisco spoke out against this law, but it was still passed.
So the Chinese Secret Service Act is not unique, but it still makes some people nervous. Many non-Chinese experts have dealt with the law, and there is nothing unique about it.
Clifford Chance, a British company, Cremades and Calvo Sotelo, a Spanish company, came to the same conclusion. The conclusion is: "The Chinese Secret Service Law cannot force companies to spy . "
In addition, the Chinese law only applies in China. It does not include subsidiaries or operations outside of China. This is very different from some of the above U.S. laws that give the government access to data outside of the U.S.
The contribution Huawei should spy for China? US laws also force American companies to do this! first appeared on Xiaomist .
Comments
Post a Comment